The following three pairs each contain one secondary source (review) and one primary source (original research) that was cited in the corresponding secondary source. Can you correctly identify each of these as a primary or secondary source?
Highlight for answer: The article by Farooq et al. is the secondary source; the article by Nouri and Hamdaoui is the primary source. A good way to tell in this pair is the word "review" in the title of the first article.
Jolly, W. M., Parsons, R. A., Hadlow, A. M., Cohn, G. M., McAllister, S. S., Popp, J. B., … Negron, J. F. (2012). Relationships between moisture, chemistry, and ignition of Pinus contorta needles during the early stages of mountain pine beetle attack. Forest Ecology and Management, 269, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.022
Highlight for answer: The article by Jenkins et al. is the secondary source; the article by Jolly et al. is the primary source. A good way to tell in this pair is the word "review" in the ScienceDirect database, above the title of the first article.